| News

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Bethel Park seeks fact-finding in teacher negotiations

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.
Wednesday, Aug. 21, 2013, 5:30 p.m.

The Bethel Park School District has requested a state-appointed fact-finder to make recommendations in the ongoing negotiations with the district's teachers union, a move that precludes the possibility of a strike at the beginning of the school year.

District leaders made the request Wednesday after their 21st round of negotiations with the Bethel Park Federation of Teachers, which has been working under the terms of an expired contract since June 30, 2010.

State law prohibits the union from going on strike during a fact-finding inquiry. The process requires time for the state to appoint a third party, time for both sides to present their best contract offers, 40 days for the fact-finder to issue recommendations and 10 days for the district and the union to notify the state whether they accept or reject the recommendations as the basis for a new contract.

District spokeswoman Vicki Flotta and federation President Diann Smith said teachers didn't intend to strike as students prepared to return to school Sept. 3.

“We're doing it because we feel it's a good tool to use going forward,” Flotta said.

Union representatives said the district's request surprised them.

“We negotiated today and nothing was said. ... In the past, it was discussed as to what the other side was considering,” said Smith, who called a negotiation session this month productive.

“(A strike) was always on the back burner, but it's not been discussed with the members,” Smith said. “We've not had a general membership meeting all summer. ... I told the members last year that we'd bring them any major decisions like that.”

The two sides can continue to negotiate during fact-finding, Flotta said. Through three years of negotiation and a six-week strike in late 2010, the two sides continue to disagree primarily over salaries and benefits issues. Non-binding arbitration in 2011 set the stage for a contract, but both sides rejected the recommendations.

Matthew Santoni is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5625 or

Add Matthew Santoni to your Google+ circles.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.




Show commenting policy

Most-Read Allegheny

  1. North Hills transit service limits lamented
  2. Newsmaker: Rudolph ‘Rudy’ Zupancic
  3. Downtown Pittsburgh Macy’s donates bits of history
  4. Police looking for man who sexually assaulted Squirrel Hill woman
  5. Siblings sue over gas rights in Jefferson Hills land parcel
  6. Founder of Operation Safety Net in Pittsburgh named one of CNN’s 2015 Top 10 Heroes
  7. Former Pittsburgh mayoral candidate sentenced to prison for bogus 911 calls
  8. Allegheny County Sheriff’s deputies apprehend one of county’s ‘most wanted fugitives’
  9. Former employee at Plum home-building firm charged with embezzling nearly $200K
  10. Pittsburgh considering legislation to ban drone activity from city parks, playgrounds
  11. Pittsburgh’s North Shore traffic gets critical look