ShareThis Page

Anonymity the new Web word

| Thursday, Sept. 5, 2013, 12:22 a.m.

Nicole Haas takes time every day to delete so-called cookies from her computer.

“I've just always done it,” said the 25-year-old preschool teacher from Shaler.

Ensuring that the pesky files aren't gathering information about her online use and taking up space on her hard drive is second nature. Haas disables location devices when she downloads a new app to her smartphone.

Eighty-six percent of Internet users take steps to mask their online profiles, a new Pew Research Center survey for Carnegie Mellon University found. Nearly two-thirds delete cookies or their browser history. Others use public computers to try to surf anonymously, while still others attempt to encrypt communications or turn to temporary user names and passwords.

The survey was conducted in July, two months after former NSA contractor Edward Snowden triggered cries for enhanced Internet privacy with his revelations of a large government electronic surveillance program.

“In the past, we thought very few people purposely tried to do anything to conceal their identity or communications. But now we know it's not just a small group of hackers. Almost everyone has done some thing to avoid surveillance,” CMU computer science Professor Sara Kiesler, who authored a report on the survey released Thursday.

Even as two-thirds of those surveyed said their photos, email addresses and work places easily can be found online, about an equal percentage said Internet privacy laws do not protect them.

Jacob H. Rooksby, an assistant professor of law at Duquesne University, said web users rarely understand what they're giving up in privacy when they use sites, which can have complex terms-of-use agreements or track users through cookies, which many people never realize have been embedded in their computers.

“The concern is we are signing away fundamental laws involving our rights through (Internet site) terms of service agreements,” Rooksby said.

That is pushing the courts and legal scholars to develop laws to address privacy concerns.

“The technology — and the culture around it — has outpaced the law,” said Parker Higgins of the San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation. “Law is a slow-moving solution. That's one reason why it's important to make sure that the law doesn't prevent privacy-enhancing tools from being developed and adopted.”

Kurt Karafinski, 57, of Glenshaw, who has worked in data processing and analysis for 30 years, said he didn't ponder online privacy when he got into the business.

He's not surprised younger Americans might consider it a concern.

“They've grown up on social media,” Karafinski said.

That's how Natasha Young and her friends communicate. The 21-year-old Point Park University senior said she and her friends use privacy settings to prohibit anyone outside their circle from viewing their information on social media sites.

“We like to share things online, but we don't want anyone other than our friends to view it,” Young said.

That's the paradox, Rooksby said.

“When you think about platforms like Facebook and their ever-changing terms-of-service agreements that few people read, but basically say they can do anything with your information, you see Facebook isn't in it for free,” he said.

Facebook did not respond to a request for comment.

A growing number of people — 50 percent in the new survey compared to 33 percent in 2009 — worry about how much of their personal information is online.

“We go out and do these things. We love the benefits and then we worry about the risks,” Kiesler said.

Debra Erdley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7996 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.