Share This Page

Newsmaker: Dr. Henk ten Have

| Sunday, Sept. 8, 2013, 7:13 p.m.
Henk ten Have, 62, of Pittsburgh, director of Duquesne Unviersity’s Center for Healthcare Ethics

Noteworthy: ten Have, director of Duquesne University's Center for Healthcare Ethics, is among international experts invited to Paris this month to discuss UNESCO's (the United Nation's Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization) bioethics achievements during the past 20 years and help guide its future.

Age: 62

Residence: Downtown

Family: Wife and daughter

Background: ten Have has an international background in bioethics. He was director of the Division of Ethics of Science and Technology at UNESCO from 2003 until he came to Duquesne in 2010. He was a researcher, physician and university professor of medical ethics at universities in the Netherlands.

Education: M.D., Medicine, Leiden University, the Netherlands, 1976; Dr. med, Medicine, Leiden University, 1978; doctor of philosophy, Leiden University, 1983.

Quote: “On a global scale, one of the biggest issues facing bioethics is that many people don't have any access to health care. You have people dying from diseases that are treatable. ... People in more developed countries will argue we need to focus on new technologies and we need to anticipate the ethical issues that will emerge from them, but most people in developing countries will say, ‘We cannot even acquire the technologies.' ”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.