Newsmaker: Richard V. Piacentini
Marc Mondor and Richard Piacentini, the Executive Director of The Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens at the Wines Under Glass 2012: Toasting Great Growth to a Greener Future event at Phipps Conservatory, Friday, October 19, 2012.
Photo by Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
Noteworthy: Board members at the nonprofit International Living Future Institute in Seattle have picked Piacentini to serve a year as their secretary. A nonprofit group, the institute encourages sustainable building designs that have low environmental impact.
Residence: Squirrel Hill.
Family: Wife, Jan, and two children.
Occupation: Executive director at the Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens in Oakland.
Education: Piacentini earned a bachelor's degree in pharmacy from the University of Rhode Island in 1977; a master's degree in business administration from Virginia Commonwealth University in 1980; and a master's degree in botany from the University of Connecticut in 1984.
Background: Recruited to join Phipps in 1994, Piacentini had been the director at the Leila Arboretum in Battle Creek, Mich. He also serves on the board at the Waldorf School of Pittsburgh. Piacentini will remain in his job at Phipps as he does work for the Living Future Institute.
Quote: “Places like Phipps can really serve a great purpose in showing how these kinds of (sustainable) lifestyles can be done. They're important. We can introduce people to these ideas because people come here for inspiration and learning.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.