Baldwin High School cafeteria manager fired over food flap
Baldwin High School cafeteria manager Kristy Morgan was fired because school officials say she threw away food that a football boosters group left in the school cafeteria.
The Baldwin-Whitehall School Board voted, 7-2, on Wednesday to terminate Morgan, who has worked for the district for two years.
Board member Martin Michael Schmotzer brought the matter to a vote, citing the discarded food and saying other situations were involved. Morgan declined to comment on Thursday.
Football booster members left prepared food in the high school kitchen on Aug. 13 that was served that day and was to be served to players on Aug. 14 during the high school's football camp, district Superintendent Randal Lutz said.
Groups must obtain permission to use the kitchen from Tammy Caponi, the food service director, and while the boosters filed a request online for a cafeteria permit, it was after the fact, Lutz said. School officials declined to specify what types of foods were thrown away.
Cafeteria staff discovered the food the morning of Aug. 14 and, not knowing who it belonged to, threw it away, Lutz said.
“Ultimately, it shouldn't have been thrown away, and it was,” he said. “The district will work with the groups to make things right.”
Board members George Pry and Kevin Fischer opposed Morgan's termination. Varsity football head coach Pete Wagner declined to comment. Football boosters President Amy Sumner earlier said the incident was a mistake and declined further comment.
Brittany Goncar is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5803.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.