Share This Page

Mourners remember 2 Ohio Township women killed in car crash near Crawford County line

| Sunday, Sept. 8, 2013,

Family and friends mourned the deaths of two Ohio Township women killed Friday in a car crash near the Crawford County line.

State troopers said Saturday that Robert J. Neubert II, 62, of Amherst, N.Y., lost control of his southbound Dodge Challenger for unknown reasons and crossed the Interstate 79 median at 5:43 p.m..

His car traveled several hundred feet on the highway and then veered into a 2012 Chevrolet Cruze being driven northbound by Susan L. Thomas, 54.

Thomas, a certified school nurse at the Western Pennsylvania School for Blind Children and passenger Mary Grace Carmody, 44, of Sewickley were pulled from their overturned car and died at the scene, state police said. Neubert died in a nearby hospital.

Thomas was traveling to visit a daughter who attended Edinboro University. She took along Carmody, a friend, family members told the Tribune-Review.

“Susan was beloved by so many people,” said Dan Ruoff, 54, her cousin from Jeannette. “She always had a smile on her face.”

Carmody was the manager of Sunny Jim's Tavern along Camp Horne Road in Kilbuck, bartender Sarah Outly said.

She said Carmody once gave her the shirt off her back, a Pirates shirt so Outly could wear it to a game.

“She was beautiful. She always put others before herself. She was a networker and a half. She knew people for miles and miles and miles, and was loved by every single one of them,” Outly said.

Carmody underwent eye surgery on Tuesday after struggling with vision problems, including cataracts, and was legally blind, Outly said, adding that her family had been in the restaurant business for years and had owned Carmody's Restaurant in Franklin Park.

Funeral arrangements for the women were pending.

Bill Vidonic and Carl Prine are staff writers for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.