ShareThis Page

Consulting firm ties let ex-VA officials win contracts

| Wednesday, Sept. 18, 2013, 12:14 a.m.
Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review
Dr. Robert Petzel, the Department of Veterans Affairs' undersecretary for health, answers questions during a hearing by the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs on Sept. 9, 2013, in the Allegheny County Courthouse, Downtown.
Stan Sinclair is CEO of Sinclair Advisory Group, formerly known as Watkins Sinclair LLC. A former deputy undersecretary at the Department of Veterans Affairs, his firm has been awarded millions of dollars in consulting contracts for the VA.

President Obama's nominee to head the Department of Veterans Affairs' health care services personally steered government consulting work to a friend who retired as a VA administrator in 2011, the Tribune-Review has learned.

Dr. Robert Petzel, nominated in 2009 and approved to head the sprawling $55 billion-a-year Veterans Health Administration, requested the services of former VA colleague Al Washko to introduce “evidence-based decision-making” to the VA, according to a posting on the Sinclair Advisory Group website.

VA officials in Washington refused to respond to questions from the Trib or to discuss Petzel's actions.

In a story published on Sunday, The Trib identified Virginia-based Sinclair as a major recipient of VA consulting contracts — many of them single-bid agreements that allowed for extensions sometimes worth more than the original contract.

Unlike Washko, Sinclair has government certification to seek federal contracts. Washko won his contract by working through Sinclair, though he neither works at the company nor directly for the company.

Federal contracts generally must be competitively bid, except in certain special emergency situations. The head of an agency typically cannot pick an old friend to award a government contract. In this case, the situation is clouded.

“He did come to me” before any consulting contract was signed, Washko said of Petzel, the VA's undersecretary for health. “I had worked for Dr. Petzel for many years.”

However, Washko said his contracts “were bid by Sinclair Advisory Group in a legal way.” Sinclair, he said, “was the contracting outfit.”

He declined to say whether his relationship with Petzel — whom friends and associates call “Randy” — gave him the inside track to get the work.

The big losers when contacts go to friends and acquaintances “are the veterans who wait longer for services they earned by protecting our nation,” said J. David Cox Sr., national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, the union representing federal employees. “Veterans and taxpayers continue to be poorly served by VA's contracting practices.”

Sinclair and other government consulting contractors say their work often comes at a bargain because they know the system and how it works, and sometimes the personalities involved.

Sinclair was the subject of a blistering Inspector General report in 2010 for receiving no-bid contracts from the VA, contrary to federal rules. “Sinclair associates” who work through the company to win government contacts are a Who's Who of former VA officials, the Trib found.

At the top is Stan Sinclair, former VA deputy undersecretary for benefits — one of four deputy undersecretaries in the department. His son Seth operates the company.

The General Services Administration authorized the firm to bid on individual contracts worth less than $1 million. The Trib found the VA awarded Sinclair more than 160 such consulting contracts. The contracts typically are awarded to an associate who is a former VA official using Sinclair's approval to win government work.

In June 2011, Sinclair Advisory Group mentioned on its website that Petzel asked Washko to work for the VA. It is unclear whether others bid on the work.

During Petzel's confirmation hearing, Sen. Mike Johanns, R.-Neb., said Washko personally lobbied him on Petzel's behalf.

“Al Washko … gave me a call just a few days ago and pointed out to me that he had worked under you at some point in his career,” Johanns said. “He spoke of your leadership, your integrity and what you brought to the job, and could not have given you a more positive recommendation.”

Johanns told Petzel that Washko's lobbying “carried a lot of weight.”

Until his retirement in 2011, Washko headed the VHA system in Nebraska and Western Iowa, which is part of the regional Veterans Integrated Service Network 23. Petzel headed VISN23 until President Obama selected him to lead veterans' health care nationwide.

Washko would not say how much his contracts were worth but said his work is complete.

Sinclair reported on June 8, 2011: “At the request of VA Under Secretary of Health Randy Petzel, Sinclair Associate Albert (Al) Washko is helping” to make the VA “people-centric, forward thinking, and results-oriented.”

Washko was to “help senior managers at 12 VA facilities throughout the nation” adopt a data-mining process he developed in Omaha, the online newsletter said.

Government databases show two contracts of about $500,000 awarded to Sinclair by the VA about the time of that announcement, though it's not known whether either contract involved Washko.

Lou Kilzer is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-380-5628 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.