Pittsburgh official backs historic nomination for Produce Terminal
A top preservation official recommended the Pittsburgh Planning Commission approve a request to designate the 87-year-old Produce Terminal Building in the Strip District a historic structure.
“I absolutely agree with the nomination,” Sarah Quinn, the city's historic preservation planner, said after briefing the commissioners. “The building is fairly unaltered. The building is very clearly a landmark. The building is historic.”
The commission could vote on the nomination next month. Its decision would go to City Council, which could vote to accept or reject the commission's recommendation.
If council approves the nomination, it could stop Strip District-based The Buncher Co. from demolishing about 30 percent of the building as part of a $400 million development planned for the Strip District.
President and CEO Thomas J. Balestrieri previously said his company would proceed with the development regardless of the historic designation of the Produce Terminal. Balestrieri could not be reached for comment on Tuesday.
During the early 20th century, the building served first railcars and later trucks carrying fresh produce from Florida and California.
Referencing the historic nomination form prepared by nonprofit Preservation Pittsburgh and Sarah Kroloff, a Lawrenceville architect, Quinn said the Produce Terminal was the last remaining structure of its type, unique because of its length and linked to the history of the Strip.
The Urban Redevelopment Authority owns the nearly 1,500-foot-long building between 16th and 21st streets. The Buncher Co., a private developer, has an agreement to buy the building for $1.8 million.
Commissioners could consider whether to approve the nomination at their Oct. 15 meeting, Quinn said. The city's Historic Review Commission, which gave preliminary approval for the nomination in July, could make their determination on Oct. 2.
Aaron Aupperlee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7986 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Contempt citation sought by state against Highmark for alleged violation of deal with UPMC
- VA promotion for administrator stuns legislator
- Prosecutors say cyanide-death defendant Ferrante tested toxin on mice to gauge effect on human
- Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office asked to prosecute case alleging assault of Allegheny County assistant district attorney
- Canadians more fearful, aware after ‘very rare’ attack in Ottawa
- Newsmaker: Mary Barkhymer
- Peduto, Harris compromise on $1.6M for North Side community center
- Savvy Service Employees International Union ‘keeps light on’
- Police arrest 8, cite more than 2 dozen after riots in Morgantown
- Pittsburgh police officers start wearing video cameras
- Ross brothers ordered to pay fine, remove debris from Christmas display