Pennsylvanians sound off on Obamacare: Penalty won't be enough to make smokers kick habit
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, Sept. 28, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
For health coverage under the Affordable Care Act, Sterling Carlisle and thousands of other smokers will have to pay an annual penalty of hundreds of dollars.
Yet Carlisle doesn't think that will be enough to deter many people who are addicted to cigarettes. Pack-a-day smokers in Pennsylvania pay more than $2,400 a year toward their habit.
The law will keep smokers from paying higher insurance premiums as a result of pre-existing conditions.
“It sounds fair,” said Carlisle, 24, of Highland Park. He pays about $200 a month for individual health insurance, provided through his employer, and would want to see whether online, government-run insurance exchanges offer a better price.
Exact rates through the exchanges will hinge on a participant's age, location and income, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services won't release those prices until Tuesday.
Government figures show smokers' premiums could run as much as 50 percent higher than regular individual rates. The difference could amount to an effective smoking penalty of $1,500 or more each year.
— Adam Smeltz
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Troy Hill building owner sets auction to clear out building
- Pennsylvania PUC officer finds Lyft, Uber drivers easy to pursue in Pittsburgh
- Pittsburgh region’s business growth slowed by type of startups
- Drilling prep could begin next week near airport
- McDonald Roberts named chair of city Housing Authority
- Rights groups agree to pay Pittsburgh half of UPMC protest costs
- Democrats consider Pittsburgh for 2016 national convention
- Pope Francis inspires incredible optimism
- Newsmaker: Matthew Opdyke
- Newsmakers: Nicholas and Louis Suarez
- Allegheny County Airport Authority’s former president exits with $186K deal