Trib study finds lack of state, federal regulation for Allegheny County Veterans Court
Klein Michael Thaxton was a former soldier and armed carjacker from McKeesport participating in an Allegheny County Veterans Court rehabilitation program when he brought downtown Pittsburgh to a halt.
Armed with a kitchen knife and hammer, Thaxton held a Ligonier businessman hostage on Sept. 21, 2012, in Three Gateway Center — at times sending Facebook messages to friends — before surrendering after six hours.
Thaxton, 23, was in Veterans Court to expunge or reduce his carjacking sentence while getting housing help, counseling and probation monitoring. As a result of a standoff with police, he was thrown out of the court's docket and is serving six to 15 years in state prison for kidnapping.
Special courts to help veterans are a growing trend nationwide. The Department of Veterans Affairs has tracked the establishment of at least 168 courts for former military members since 2004 — 17 in Pennsylvania, including Allegheny, Butler and Beaver counties. They evolved from special drug and mental health dockets designed to root out the causes of crime by addressing convicts' psychological problems or addiction issues.
To enter Allegheny County Veterans Court, Thaxton had to get through Assistant District Attorney Debra Barnisin-Lange, VA representatives, probation officials and others on the court's team who decide which offenders to accept. Victims and arresting officers get a vote.
“If we can offer the services and support, and release them into the community better than we found them, then it's a risk the parties all take together,” Lange told the Tribune-Review.
The Thaxton case triggered a Trib examination of 66 defendants admitted into Allegheny County Veterans Court since Common Pleas Judge John A. Zottola founded it in 2009.
The Trib's verdict:
• No uniform federal or Pennsylvania rules exist to guide courts on the veterans they should admit or what they must accomplish to transition to civilian life, what the courts call “graduating.”
Philadelphia, for example, diverts veterans charged with nonviolent offenses to the special dockets run by district magistrates; Allegheny County enrolls at the more serious Common Pleas Court level. The Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts recently received money to study the courts and will issue findings next year, as will the VA.
• Thaxton was not an anomaly. Allegheny County Veterans Court accepts violent criminals that other programs routinely reject, such as arsonists, drug dealers and domestic-abuse defendants. The Trib found a dozen defendants who committed crimes here and in other states while in the program.
• Military records indicate a third of Allegheny County defendants left the military as privates after an average of three years in uniform. Of the 48 men and women who would have been eligible to receive a good conduct medal, only 18 received them — a red flag signaling the nature of their service.
Thaxton, for example, never deployed and spent 17 months in the Army before leaving involuntarily. He displayed increasingly erratic behavior on his return to McKeesport as he spiraled deeper into mental illness, military and court records show.
• Pennsylvania judges and court officials established Veterans Court as a way to trim repeat offenders and jail populations. Of 38 defendants who graduated from Allegheny County's program during the past four years, only one veteran was re-arrested. That recidivism rate is 20 times lower than the state average for men leaving prison, and it's remarkable when considering the county accepts violent felons such as Thaxton.
The Trib found one in five veterans entered Allegheny County's program after committing crimes involving guns or knives, sometimes against police.
About two of every three defendants on Zottola's docket finished their treatment programs. That is similar to the national graduation rate, VA researchers say. Those who violate the terms of their plan are thrown out of the program and finish their sentences in jail or on probation.
Pittsburgh is not alone. In Philadelphia, 341 veterans convicted of nonviolent misdemeanors have graduated since 2010. According to the court, one in 15 graduates later was convicted of a crime — higher than Allegheny County's rate but far below the state average.
The low recidivism rate impresses Karen Blackburn, who is studying the special dockets for the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts.
“For everyone who isn't in jail, you have someone living a productive life,” she said.
“It's not a free pass. It's a program, and people monitor you,” said Andrew Armour, 46, of Homewood, an Army artilleryman in Iraq during Operation Desert Storm who graduated from the court on Thursday.
Armour entered the special docket in 2012 and enrolled in anger management courses. He was accused of beating his wife and preventing her from leaving home.
A VA employee, Armour credits Veterans Court with bringing him “back to church for the first time in years,” getting help for stress and getting out of a toxic relationship. He has not committed a crime since entering the program, county records show.
“The court looks at you and says let's find a way to incorporate us back into society, instead of treating us like common criminals,” Armour said.
Keeping veterans out of jail saves taxpayers money, though Zottola's court can't say how much. He estimates “thousands of dollars each,” partly because Duquesne University law students represent indigent veterans for free, but mostly because VA picks up the bill — about $20,000 for each defendant who qualifies for the agency's programs.
The low number of re-offenders and the savings to the state's taxpayers propelled Supreme Court Justice Seamus McCaffery, a former Philadelphia cop, to enthusiastically stump statewide for counties to start veterans courts.
His opinion counts: He's a veteran of the Marine Corps and the Air Force Reserve.
“You're hearing this from a former cop: We can't continue to just warehouse people,” he said. “We just can't keep throwing people in jail.”
McCaffery concedes that in their haste to get VA help for Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, Pennsylvania judges have to “learn as we go along” with Veterans Court. He acknowledges “deficiencies in the program.”
Overall, however, he thinks Pennsylvania's court system for veterans is “well-oiled and efficient.”
Carl Prine is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at email@example.com or 412-320-7826.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Lawsuit: Pittsburgh Public Schools should have known officer was abusing boys
- Highmark asks patients to ‘Meet Dr. Right’
- 2 from Carrick charged in connection with rash of heroin overdoses
- Development could soon be booming in West End
- Police confiscated cellphone of driver who struck 7-year-old girl Thursday
- Justice halts religious groups’ birth control opt-out role
- Teachers union advises lawyers for colleagues of Plum pair investigated on sex charges
- Pitt, Penn State faculty found to receive better-than-average pay
- Voters wishing to cast ballot in May 19 primary must register by Monday
- Allegheny County sheriff’s deputy mending from Family Court scuffle
- Heinz Endowments looks to smart urban planning for Pittsburgh moment