Share This Page

Newsmaker: Kathleen Glenister Roberts

| Sunday, Oct. 13, 2013, 9:50 p.m.
Kathleen Glenister Roberts, director of Duquesne University’s Honors College and an associate professor in the Department of Communication and Rhetorical Studies, received the university's Eugene P. Beard Award for Leadership in Ethics.

Noteworthy: Duquesne University awarded Roberts its Eugene P. Beard Award for Leadership in Ethics.

Age: 42

Residence: Shaler

Family: Husband, Cannon; and son, Cooper, 13, and Kieran, 5.

Occupation: Director of Duquesne's Honors College and an associate professor in the Department of Communication and Rhetorical Studies

Background: Teaches religious education at St. Bonaventure Church in Shaler and has prepared 68 students for confirmation since 2010. She serves on the finance board of the National Communication Association, the executive council of the Eastern Communication Association and on the board of the Daisy Wilson Artists Community.

Education: Bachelor's degree in English and American studies from the University of Richmond, 1993; master's in English and history from the University of Notre Dame, 1995; doctorate concentrating in sociolinguistics from Indiana University Bloomington, 2001.

Quote: “Some of the people who won this award previously are ones that I have looked up to for a long time, and I couldn't accomplish anything as a teacher without the amazing support of colleagues, staff, family and friends.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.