Pennsylvania school achievement data posted online
State Education officials on Wednesday posted on the web rankings of 3,000 Pennsylvania schools, but scores gauging academic achievement and other performance measures for 573 schools were missing.
The release is part of the implementation of School Performance Profiles, which are designed to compare schools by enrollment, graduation rates, test scores and other factors. The system assigns a number grade from 1 to 100; with extra credit, the score may be as high as 107.
Acting Education Secretary Carolyn Dumaresq said previously that she chose not to further delay posting incomplete data, in part, to meet federal deadlines for Title 1 funding to schools with high populations of low-income children.
Dumaresq blamed earlier delays on discrepancies in how educators administered Keystone Exams. Superintendents, including dozens in Western Pennsylvania, asked the state to withhold data from the public until the information is corrected.
James Fogerty, communications director for A Plus Schools, a watchdog group for Pittsburgh Public Schools, said the organization will delay its annual report until the state updates school scores in mid-December.
“We've been talking about this internally a lot lately,” he said. “It just doesn't make sense to roll out a report based on incomplete data.”
The state initially suppressed profiles for 624 schools that indicated the state collected incomplete or inaccurate data. An additional 1,444 schools requested minor changes but allowed their profiles to be published in the initial launch.
Profiles are available online at paschoolperformance.org.
A disclaimer that greets website visitors states that flawed data on the site “will be updated as soon as possible.”
Megan Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5815 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.