ShareThis Page

Hotel considered at Rivers to keep casino competitive with others in state

Tom Fontaine
| Thursday, Oct. 10, 2013, 11:56 p.m.
A man walks across the street in front of the Rivers Casino on the North Side on Sunday, April 14, 2013.
Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
A man walks across the street in front of the Rivers Casino on the North Side on Sunday, April 14, 2013.

A Rivers Casino spokesman said on Thursday that it has nearly completed $1 million in renovations and is considering expansion to keep pace in the region's increasingly competitive gambling industry.

“Gaming is very competitive with the variety of different choices people have, so we're always looking for ways to enhance the experience for our guests,” said Rivers General Manager Craig Clark.

The renovations didn't add amenities but expanded gambling options to attract more players. The Rivers relocated its Players Club to a larger space with more windows. The 4-year-old casino added two blackjack tables and 24 slot machines, bringing the total number of machines to 2,959.

It also rearranged tables around the West End Café to make room for future craps and blackjack tournaments, pending state approval.

Clark said officials are studying whether to build a hotel at the site, as the late Detroit businessman Don Barden envisioned when he announced plans in 2006 for the Majestic Star Casino on the North Shore. Although a hotel was part of his winning bid, plans didn't materialize and financial problems forced Barden to give up his controlling interest in the casino, which then became The Rivers.

“That is something we continue to look at,” Clark said, noting there is room on adjacent parcels that the casino owns.

Mount Airy Resort Casino in Mt. Pocono opened with a hotel in 2007. Two years ago, Sands Casino Resort in Bethlehem became the first hotel to be added to a Pennsylvania casino. Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs in Wilkes-Barre is set to open a hotel next month. The Meadows said last year that it is considering whether to build one.

“Having a hotel may make sense, given the increased competition,” said Alex Bumazhny, an industry analyst with Fitch Ratings investment research service in New York. “It keeps patrons there longer, and they can start playing earlier in the morning and keep playing later into the night.”

Bumazhny said hotel rooms could be a draw for people who live more than an hour north of Pittsburgh, near a proposed casino site in Lawrence County and one under construction near Youngstown.

The Rivers is one of seven casinos within a two-hour drive of Pittsburgh, increasing competition for gamblers' dollars.

The others are The Meadows Racetrack & Casino in North Strabane; Lady Luck Casino at Fayette County's Nemacolin Woodlands Resort; Presque Isle Downs & Casino in Erie; Mountaineer Casino, Racetrack & Resort and Wheeling Island, both in West Virginia; and Horseshoe Cleveland Casino.

“We are pretty much reaching a saturation point with casinos,” said Bumazhny.

Slot machines at The Rivers generated $22.1 million in revenue in September, down 1.2 percent from September 2012, according to state Gaming Control Board data. Table games brought in $6.1 million in August, down 7.6 percent from August 2012, the board's latest data show.

Clark said 50,000 square feet remain unused inside the casino that could become a restaurant and a banquet hall. He expects a decision to be made within a year. The casino is home to nine restaurants and bars, and it has a 1,000-seat riverfront amphitheater.

Tom Fontaine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7847 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.