Share This Page

Broad formula used to set bonds

| Monday, Dec. 23, 2013, 12:12 a.m.

A district judge ordered a man accused of shooting someone 11 times to remain in jail under a $20,000 bond, the amount another man paid to get out of jail on charges he stole three candy bars.

The cases are an example of bonds that Pittsburgh police consider inconsistent and frustrating.

“They arrest somebody for a shooting or a stabbing, and then they're out. And then another person commits a crime that's not as serious, and they're still in jail,” said Zone 6 Cmdr. Scott Schubert, whose detectives charged Lenell Ptomey, 30, with attempted homicide in the shooting of Thomas Romesburg on Sept. 17 and Mark Winkowski, 40, with the candy bar theft in April 2012.

“It's disheartening when you see somebody involved in violent crime, and you find out they're out on a $20,000 bond. It just kind of blows your mind,” Schubert said.

Ptomey, slapped with a retainer for a probation violation, remains in the Allegheny County Jail awaiting formal arraignment in Common Pleas Court. Winkowski, convicted of 15 thefts, pleaded guilty to retail theft this time and was sentenced to two years' probation.

Janice Dean is director of pretrial services for Allegheny County and oversees the 12 bail investigators who make recommendations on bonds to district judges tasked with arraignments in Pittsburgh Municipal Courts.

The investigators do not recommend monetary amounts in their risk assessment reports.

“What amount of money would make it safe to release someone?” Dean said. “If someone is accused of rape and can pay $50,000, does that make it safer? There's no national research that shows an amount of money makes it safe.”

The investigators consider a defendant's criminal history, how long he or she has lived at the current home, employment and other factors to determine the likelihood that the person will reoffend, or show up in court, Dean said. They did about 22,000 such investigations in 2012.

“We don't only look at the charge,” Dean said. “I think a lot of times people look at the charge and nothing else, but we look at other things.”

Based on their findings, the investigators recommend whether to release the defendant, set a nonmonetary bond or set no bond because the person is too high-risk, Dean said.

“Your risk assessment is saying, ‘Eighty percent of people who match this criteria are going to act this way,' ” Dean said. “You're playing the odds a little, but it's better than a gut instinct.”

District Judge Mary Murray, president of the Special Court Judges Association of Allegheny County, said magistrates do not have to follow the recommendations of bail investigators.

“You can go with whatever you feel like,” Murray said. “It's very subjective. I will see ones where they have 50 to 60 retail thefts, and it's the holiday season, so I might put a high bond on them, where somebody else puts no bond.”

Schubert raised the possibility of guidelines for judges on monetary bonds, such as a range of amounts, but Murray said there's no movement to change the procedure.

“You worry that — let's say I put somebody out, and they go and kill somebody, and they say, ‘You didn't put a bond on him,' ” Murray said. “There's always that in the back of your head.”

Margaret Harding is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8519 or mharding@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.