Paragon Food Service to buy Lawrenceville site from URA for $893,000
By Tom Fontaine
Published: Friday, Nov. 15, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
A Lawrenceville food distributor has reached a deal to buy nearly 13 acres from the city's Urban Redevelopment Authority.
The URA voted on Thursday to sell the 12.77-acre property it owns at the 62nd Street Industrial Park to Paragon Food Service for $893,000.
“They are looking to grow in a big way,” URA Director Robert Rubinstein said of Paragon, which he described as Pittsburgh's largest independently owned fresh foods distributor.
The 62nd Street property used to be home to a Tippins International Inc. steel fabrication plant.
Paragon plans to use the land for a fresh-produce distribution center and processing plant. It is considering building greenhouses so it can grow fresh fruits and vegetables on the site.
“It gives us an opportunity to be much more creative,” said Elaine Bellin, president of Paragon, which employs 107 people at its smaller existing site on 36th Street.
Paragon has been based in Pittsburgh for about 50 years.
The Strip District-based Buncher Co. had an option to buy part of the 62nd Street site from the URA in a deal that gave the URA exclusive rights to buy a distribution center Buncher owns on 43rd Street. The URA board rescinded that deal in September. Buncher did not return a call.
Before the sale closes with Paragon, the company must present its final development plans and proof of financing.
Tom Fontaine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7847 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Shale oil, gas drilling boom wins favor with labor unions, thwarting environmentalists
- Change in kidney allocation rules should help patients
- Population expansion in Western Pennsylvania hinges on immigrants
- Landslides put Baldwin firefighters in financial peril
- Catholic learning sessions to start in Pittsburgh
- Officials identify Chartiers shooting victim as Wilkinsburg man
- Film tax credits bill would bump up state budget
- Newsmaker: James Lange
- Patients nationwide die waiting as 1 in 5 kidneys rejected by doctors
- Pope Francis inspires incredible optimism
- Bullied South Fayette student’s case prompts wiretap overhaul legislation