Sainthood pushed to raise diversity
Cecile Springer is hoping days like Sunday can help revitalize the Catholic Church.
Springer and several parishioners at St. Paul Cathedral in Oakland have been among Catholics researching and promoting sainthood for three black American women.
Pittsburgh Bishop David A. Zubik celebrated a special Mass, in which Springer and nuns from New Orleans participated, to draw attention to the cause.
“We have never had African-American women even thought of in the context of becoming saints,” Springer said. It “is a miracle in and of itself.”
There are so few saints from the United States that adding some, especially from the black community, can be a big inspiration to people, bringing more into the church, Springer said. There's been a growing push in the church to have multi-cultural committees, and many have taken up this cause, said Sister Clare of Assisi Pierre, a school principal from New Orleans who helped lead the events at St. Paul.
Being promoted for sainthood are: Mother Mary Elizabeth Lange, born in Cuba of Haitian parents, the founder of a religious order for black women and founder of a school for black girls in Baltimore; Mother Henriette DeLille, who helped yellow fever victims and started Sisters of the Holy Family in New Orleans; and Sister Thea Bowman, a Mississippi native who entered religious life in Michigan and made visits to Pittsburgh promoting inter-cultural understanding, church officials said.
“In our church, we don't see many people of color. And we don't think of our founding communities being of African-American race,” Pierre said. “But we have very influential people of African-American descent who have made significant strides for the Catholic church and have done tremendous humanitarian work.”
Timothy Puko is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7991 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.