ShareThis Page

Media tie attack to 'knockout'; police disagree

| Thursday, Nov. 21, 2013, 11:49 p.m.

High school teacher James Addlespurger didn't believe his shocking attack in a Downtown alley was linked to the “knockout game” grabbing headlines around the world this week.

But watching surveillance video of the assault matched to footage of more recent attacks in other cities makes him wonder.

“The thing that really gets you is the reaction of the actors and the other kids,” said Addlespurger, 51, a teacher at the Creative and Performing Arts High School, Downtown, whose random attack in October 2012 has been cited by media as evidence of a growing trend. “It certainly gives you thoughts that there is this thing going on.”

Pittsburgh police said on Thursday that they don't believe Dajour Washington, 16, who sucker-punched Addlespurger as he walked on Tito Way last year, was participating in knockout, in which passers-by are targeted with a goal of knocking someone out with one punch.

“There was some discussion that it could be and that we were possibly on the cusp of some trend here,” said Cmdr. Eric Holmes, whose investigators in the Hill District station determined there was no connection. “It never played out in that direction.”

Washington was adjudicated delinquent in juvenile court of aggravated assault. He could not be reached.

Police in several cities are reviewing incidents to determine if they're related to the game, including attacks in New York and Washington, a fatal attack in Jersey City and two incidents in Lower Merion, a tony Philadelphia suburb.

Some experts question whether a trend exists, or if media hype during November TV ratings sweeps is feeding a frenzy.

Jeffrey Butts, director of the Research and Evaluation Center at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, called the response an example of what late colleague Jock Young coined “moral panic.”

“It's a hysterical reaction to something that is shocking ... independent of actual facts of the matter,” said Butts, who fielded interview requests on knockout from as far away as Japan.

Knockout is not new, as some media outlets claim in breathless introductions to horrifying videos. Authorities have no indication it's happening more frequently. Lower Merion Lt. Frank Higgins said he's learning more about knockout from media reports than fellow law officers as his department tries to determine if that's why at least one victim there was attacked.

“Some of the reporting lacks what I call critical thinking. Where's the proof these things are actually related to each other?” asked Al Tompkins, a senior faculty member and media expert at Poynter Institute in St. Petersburg, Fla.

News stories cite a report by a CBS affiliate in New York and link to a video report that includes footage of Addlespurger's attack and interviews with anonymous teens in Jersey City explaining the game.

“Note that none of those people claim to be involved,” Butts said. “They're repeating what they've heard.”

All of the teens pictured are black, which helps feed the frenzy, Butts said. He and Tompkins said they've observed such reactions to isolated crimes such as the 1989 “wilding” attacks in New York, in which people ran wild in Central Park.

“The problem is you become afraid of the wrong things,” Tompkins said.

Pittsburgh police, city school police and Allegheny County authorities said they know of no examples of kids here copying the game.

Addlespurger returned to teaching and plays blues in the Jimmy Adler Band. Seeing his attack replayed by national media this week is hard, he said. He wonders if Washington or the teens with him knew about knockout.

“If he's rehabilitated, that should include reflection, and maybe someone can find out why he did it,” Addlespurger said.

Staff writer Margaret Harding contributed. David Conti is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.