TribLIVE

| News

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Videotaping hailed as tool in interrogation of suspects

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Sunday, Dec. 1, 2013, 11:20 p.m.
 

Marcus Andrejco spoke slowly and clearly as he confessed to his involvement in the violent home invasion that ended with the wounding of a Clairton police officer.

“I meant no harm. I was wrong ... I know that,” Andrejco, 20, of Rankin told detectives in the 10-minute audio recording. “I deserve to be punished.”

But during his trial last summer before Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Edward Borkowski, Andrejco denied involvement in the April 4, 2011, robbery and the shooting of Clairton police Officer James Kuzak. His mother, Jaime Andrejco, testified he was watching television with her that night.

“Officers may be overzealous to get confessions,” attorney Ralph Karsh told the jury. “He's stuck in a room and interrogated for hours and hours. The hours before that and his denials are not on tape.”

The jury cleared Andrejco of charges after two days of deliberations, even though they convicted co-defendant, Emilio Rivera, 28, of McKees Rocks. He is serving 50 to 100 years in prison.

Jurors after the verdict said they believed officers coerced Andrejco's confession, and with no physical evidence linking him to the shooting, they voted to acquit.

The verdict might have been different, legal experts said, if detectives had videotaped the confession.

“There are more cues in video interrogations than in transcripts or audio recordings,” said Mark Constanzo, a psychology professor at Claremont McKenna College near Los Angeles and an authority in police interrogation tactics. “With a video, you have so much more than the words.”

Video recording of interrogations removes the secrecy of the interview and opens officers to outside scrutiny, said Richard Leo, a UCLA law professor whose research focuses on police interviewing practices.

“As a result, interrogators are less likely to use impermissible or questionable techniques, including the psychologically coercive and improper ones that are the primary cause of false confessions,” Leo said. “Recording creates an objective, comprehensive, and reviewable record of an interrogation, making it unnecessary to rely on the incomplete, selective, and potentially biased accounts of the disputants over what occurred.”

Detractors argue that if a suspect knows he is being recorded, it will be harder to elicit a confession.

Nationwide, police use of videotaped interviews with suspects has grown in the decade since Illinois became the first state to require video-recorded interrogations in 2003. Since then, 17 states and Washington, D.C., implemented similar requirements.

“The expectations of the public are such that this is no longer a debatable issue,” said Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. “The public wants this and they're going to get it.”

Pittsburgh police began video-recording homicide suspects in March at Zappala's behest. County detectives will start using the technology soon, officials said.

The DA's office used its first videotaped confession at an arraignment last month to persuade a judge to hold Jordan Bey on homicide charges. Bey, 16, of Homewood is accused of shooting Omar Islam, 21, of Perry South seven times in the head, back and leg during a robbery.

Deputy District Attorney Dan Fitzsimmons, who prosecuted Andrejco, declined to speculate whether a videotaped confession might have swayed jurors in his case. He said he supports police video-recording their interviews if it will help get convictions.

Experts said that if police are going to videotape, they need to have a policy for conducting the interviews.

“Such a policy is also crucial from an evidentiary and prosecutorial perspective,” said a November 2012 report from The National Institute of Justice, the research, development and evaluation arm of the Department of Justice.

It's unclear whether Pittsburgh police have such a policy; department spokeswoman Diane Richard declined to comment.

Witold Walczak, legal director for the ACLU of Pennsylvania, supports videotaping from the moment a suspect enters the interview room, to show that police properly advised the person of his or her rights and how detectives elicited information.

“If you're looking to promote truth and justice, then videotaping interrogations is essential,” Walczak said.

Adam Brandolph is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-391-0927 or abrandolph@tribweb.com.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Allegheny

  1. Thief’s attorney blames Rivers Casino; judge isn’t swayed
  2. School credit ratings a problem for several in Western Pennsylvania
  3. Fugitive arrested at Plum motel on drug, gun charges
  4. Man shot several times in Allentown neighborhood
  5. Boy Scouts’ end to ban on gay leaders unnerves religious groups
  6. City, ex-manager of Pittsburgh police Office of Personnel and Finance reach settlement
  7. 2 firefighters injured in Millvale house fire
  8. Projects advance through Pittsburgh planning commission despite opposition
  9. ‘Turf battle’ blamed in fights that canceled Carrick church festival
  10. W.Va. authorities charge 87 with drug trafficking
  11. Newsmaker: Megan Cicconi