ShareThis Page

Newsmaker: Kathy Magdic

Aaron Aupperlee
| Thursday, Dec. 19, 2013, 11:39 p.m.
Kathy Magdic received the 2013 Sheila Gealey Award from the Pennsylvania Coalition of Nurse Practitioners for her work to expand the roles of nurse practitioners in the state and break down related legislative and workplace barriers.
Kathy Magdic received the 2013 Sheila Gealey Award from the Pennsylvania Coalition of Nurse Practitioners for her work to expand the roles of nurse practitioners in the state and break down related legislative and workplace barriers.

Noteworthy: Magdic received the 2013 Sheila Gealey Award from the Pennsylvania Coalition of Nurse Practitioners for her work to expand the roles of nurse practitioners in the state and break down related legislative and workplace barriers.

Age: 62

Residence: Franklin Park

Family: Husband, Michael, and sons, Matthew, 22, and Michael, 21.

Occupation: Magdic is the coordinator of the Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Program at the University of Pittsburgh and a nurse practitioner in inpatient cardiology at UPMC Presbyterian.

Background: Magdic has been a nurse practitioner since 1996 and a member of the Pennsylvania Coalition of Nurse Practitioners since 2000. She has held several leadership positions within the coalition and currently serves as its vice president.

Education: Diploma from the Presbyterian University Hospital School of Nursing, Bachelor of Science in nursing from Penn State University, Master of Science in nursing from Pitt, Doctorate in Nursing Practice from Pitt.

Quote: “We're not doctors. We don't want to be doctors. But we do have a level of education and experience that allows us to diagnose and manage patients within our scope of practice in order to improve access to care.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.