Findlay neighbors want drilling site at airport moved
By Bobby Kerlik
Published: Friday, Dec. 13, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
A group of Findlay residents wants Consol Energy to move the location of one of its proposed drilling sites at Pittsburgh International Airport, saying it's too close to their homes and could send air toxins into their neighborhood.
Homeowners from the Imperial Pointe development on Thursday told the Allegheny County Airport Authority that they want proposed well site No. 2 moved back to be at least a half mile from their houses.
“We want to feel more confident in our health and safety. We understand it meets the (state) requirement and that it's a great deal (for the airport). But we have all the risk because we live the closest,” said Stacy Faulk, 44. “If it's safe, let's have an air quality monitoring device installed. The closest one is in South Fayette, and that's unacceptable.”
Consol spokeswoman Kate O'Donovan said the company would follow safety and environmental regulations.
“We have had extensive dialogue with a wide variety of stakeholders throughout this process, and have paid specific attention to the residents of Imperial Pointe to better understand their questions and concerns,” O'Donovan said in a statement.
State Department of Environmental Protection spokesman John Poister said the law requires a 500-foot setback between drilling sites and homes. Findlay residents said documents show the site is 1,180 feet from Imperial Pointe. A half-mile setback would be 2,640 feet.
Allegheny County officials hope to raise about $500 million through an agreement with Consol, which would use six well pads to drill 47 wells on airport property. County Council in February agreed to lease more than 9,000 acres surrounding the airport, with the money earmarked to reduce gate fees to attract flights, make airport improvements and finance land development.
County Executive Rich Fitzgerald, who pushed for the drilling deal, said the county would look into their concerns.
Any negotiations on a change from Consol will be up to residents to pursue, said Chris Caruso, assistant manager at Findlay. Consol has complied with requirements in the township's municipal rules and the state's oil and gas rules, he said.
Airport Authority Chairman David Minnotte told the people who addressed the board that they would get a written response.
A spokeswoman for state Sen. Matt Smith, D-Mt. Lebanon, who is a member of the board, said he has been working to facilitate conversations between the airport authority and the residents. The Findlay residents said Smith helped arrange a meeting between them and Consol. They expect to meet with Consol officials again on Monday.
“We don't understand why Consol wouldn't do this,” said Findlay resident Bob Sterner, 52.
Staff writer Tim Puko contributed to this report. Bobby Kerlik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pittsburgh police make 71 arrests during St. Patrick’s celebrations
- Newsmaker: Arturo Valentin
- Pittsburgh firefighter’s sacrifice in 2004 built bond in Hill District
- Peduto defends trips to capital, D.C.
- Mayor’s ‘change in culture’ puts meetings on hold
- Baldwin band will stroll in New York City parade
- Climbers step up in One Oxford Centre to benefit American Lung Association
- Hampton officials urged PennDOT for years to improve site of fatal bus/car crash
- Allegheny County Democrats endorse several incumbents in primary
- ‘Hard to recycle’ events set in Western Pennsylvania
- Washington County judge: Evidence against him illegally obtained