Animal Friends rescues 55 dogs, cats from euthanasia in New Year's Eve sweep
Mayzie tucked her tail between her legs as she warily eyed the water spray.
Diane Friske tried to comfort the thin, mixed-breed dog while she gave the pup a bath.
“She thinks, ‘If I don't look at it, it will go away,' ” said Friske of Shaler, a volunteer with Animal Friends.
Mayzie was among 55 animals — 25 dogs and 30 cats — rescued from six Western Pennsylvania animal-control facilities on Tuesday as part of the Ohio Township shelter's 17th annual New Year's Eve Rescue. Volunteers rounded up the animals to save them from being euthanized, said Christy Bostardi, the shelter's spokeswoman.
“During the holidays, many pets get separated from their owners, and if they don't have a license, it's difficult to get them reunited with their families,” Bostardi said. “Animal control becomes overpopulated, and they have to euthanize to make space for other homeless pets.”
Shelter workers chose names from more than 40 Dr. Seuss books to christen each dog and cat with a new name. In addition to baths, the animals received medical checkups. Those in good health will be available for adoption beginning on Thursday, Bostardi said.
Unlike Mayzie, Horton, a rottweiler mix, wagged his tail during his bath and nail clipping.
“These dogs need a second chance — and some, a third chance,” said volunteer Rick Novosel of Pine. “I just want to help them live out a good life.”
Horton has a good chance for that, Novosel said, because the dog takes to people quickly.
“There's too many like him,” Novosel said. “If we can save just one, it's worth it. I wish we could save them all.”
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach her at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.