Newsmaker: Pat Arneson
Noteworthy: Arneson and a co-author, David Dewberry of Rider University, were awarded the National Communication Association's Franklyn S. Haiman Award for Distinguished Scholarship in Freedom of Expression. The article they wrote examined freedom of expression from 1969 to 2006 and appeared in the 2010 edition of “The Free Speech Yearbook.”
Residence: Allison Park
Occupation: Associate professor of communication and rhetorical studies at Duquesne University
Education: Bachelor's degree in speech communication, St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, Minn., 1983; Master's in philosophy of communication, Southern Illinois University, 1984; Ph.D. in rhetoric and public address, Ohio University, 1987.
Background: Interested in communication and free-speech issues ever since high school, Arneson studied the role of speech and communication in social movements and correcting injustices. Her recently finished book, “Communicative Engagement and Social Liberation: Justice Will be Made,” examined cases such as the founding of the NAACP, or women's roles in fighting lynchings of black men in the South.
Quote: “Instead of being interested in politicians — and they can be interesting — I'm interested in citizens and how we have to take responsibility for change. We're quick to point out injustice, but we have to work to make justice.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.