ShareThis Page

Newsmaker: J. David Creswell

| Thursday, Jan. 16, 2014, 11:57 p.m.
J. David Creswell, CMU professor who recently won the 2014 Distinguished Scientific Award for Early Career Contribution to Psychology in the area of health psychology from the American Psychological Association (APA). newsmaker

Age: 37

Family: Wife, Kasey Creswell

Residence: Point Breeze

Occupation: Associate professor of psychology at Carnegie Mellon University and a member of the Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition in the Dietrich College of Humanities and Social Sciences.

Noteworthy: Creswell recently won the 2014 Distinguished Scientific Award for Early Career Contribution to Psychology in the area of health psychology from the American Psychological Association. He will receive the award in August at the association's convention in Washington.

Education: Earned his bachelor's in psychology from The Colorado College in 2000; his master's in social psychology from the University of California, Los Angeles in 2003; and his Ph.D. in social psychology from UCLA in 2007.

Background: Creswell focuses on how the mind and brain influence physical health and performance; stress, coping and intervention strategies; how meditation reduces stress and improves overall health; and how self-affirmation reduces stress. Among his discoveries is the first evidence that self-affirmation promotes recovery from breast cancer and improves problem-solving under stress.

Quote: “I'm honored to receive this award and so grateful for the rich scientific health psychology environment here in Pittsburgh.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.