Negley Avenue Bridge connecting Shadyside, Centre Avenue will be replaced in 2016
Plans to replace the 89-year-old Negley Avenue Bridge are moving forward, but construction won't start until October 2016, Pittsburgh officials said on Thursday.
The bridge spans the East Busway and railroad tracks connecting Shadyside with Centre Avenue. The cost for replacement would be $3 million to $4 million, said Patrick Hassett, assistant director of Pittsburgh Public Works.
The bridge is structurally deficient and was in line to be replaced, Hassett said.
Traffic would be diverted to nearby bridges on South Aiken Avenue and South Highland Avenue that also span the busway, he said.
Port Authority spokesman Jim Ritchie said the transit agency will coordinate with the city when it becomes necessary to close the busway during construction.
In October, the city finished construction on the $4.4 million South Highland Avenue bridge, which was closed for about eight months. Construction for the Negley Avenue bridge should take about the same length of time, Hassett said. The majority of the money for that project will come from state and federal sources, he said.
The city is working with Parsons Brinckerhoff as the prime consultant for the preliminary engineering and design. The bridge was built in 1924 and rehabilitated in 1973 and carries approximately 15,000 vehicles daily, according to the firm.
The span has two lanes with sidewalks on both sides.
Bobby Kerlik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.