CVS to replace Buskey's Motel
A Route 8 motel with a storied past soon will be demolished to make way for a CVS pharmacy, and about a dozen residents are seeking a new home.
Manager Christine Perkins on Thursday distributed a written notice from the owner to residents that Buskey's Motel will close on or around Feb. 10.
“Some people have been there for years,” said Sam Dougherty, 67, a motel guest for six months.
The 22-room motel was built about 60 years ago to serve motorists using the nearby Pennsylvania Turnpike, but in recent years has offered shelter with weekly and daily rates. Today, about 15 people live in the motel, Perkins said.
Hampton Council on Jan. 22 approved site plans for a CVS on the property. Sale of the 2-acre site hinged on that vote, said Don Hultberg of the EADS Group, site consultants and project manager for BT Management of Altoona.
BT Management plans to lease a 13,225-square-foot structure as a CVS store with a drive-through pharmacy on the property. The motel is expected to be demolished shortly after it is sold.
Motel residents include an unemployed couple with a toddler.
“They can look for other accommodations,” said Narsimha Reddy of Aspinwall, general partner in NR Associates, current owner of Buskey's.
The motel was the site of a murder more than four decades ago.
James Akers, 33, was shot in the head as he lay in bed on June 29, 1972. About 14 years later an Allegheny County jury convicted his wife, Anna Akers Wolfe, of killing him.
Deborah Deasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-772-6369 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.