Share This Page

Newsmaker: Boris Weinstein

| Friday, Feb. 21, 2014, 10:20 p.m.
Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review
Councilman Corey O’Connor and mother Judy O'Connor with Clean Pittsburgh Commission chair Boris Weinstein (right) recognized Phyllis Jackson as volunteer of the year.

Noteworthy: Weinstein won the Iron Eyes Cody Award from Keep America Beautiful, its top volunteer honor. The award was presented during the organization's national conference this month in Charlotte for his dedication to preventing litter and beautifying Pittsburgh. “If anyone epitomizes the spirit of Iron Eyes Cody, it is Pittsburgh anti-litter hero, Boris Weinstein,” said CEO Jennifer Jehn.

Age: 82

Residence: Shadyside

Family: Son, Carl, and daughter, Marci Wiseman

Occupation: Retired marketing executive; volunteer

Education: Graduated from Allderdice High School in 1949 and the University of Pittsburgh with a bachelor's degree in 1953

Background: Weinstein's involvement in litter prevention dates to 1970, when he coined the phrase “For Pete's Sake” for Pittsburgh Mayor Pete Flaherty. The phrase was used on waste containers during Flaherty's administration. Years later, Weinstein became a member and chairman of Pittsburgh's Clean Pittsburgh Commission. In 2006, Weinstein started working with community leaders in Homewood and Squirrel Hill to form a “Redd Up” Coalition.

Quote: “My life in retirement mirrors many of the Keep America Beautiful principles,” Weinstein said. “I work to rid us of litter. I work for a cleaner environment. I believe one person can make a difference.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.