Trib's Hiel honored for reporting on Coptic Christians
Tribune-Review foreign correspondent Betsy Hiel won a national award for religion coverage, the Religion Communicators Council announced on Wednesday.
Hiel won one of 25 Wilbur Awards for excellence by individuals in secular media in communicating religious issues, positive values and themes during 2013. She was honored for her coverage of Coptic Christians under attack in Egypt, published in the Trib from Aug. 15 through Christmas Day.
The 85-year-old council, the country's oldest public relations professional association, has presented Wilbur Awards annually since 1949. Competition is open to all forms of media, including books, films, radio and television. Contest organizers said outside professionals evaluate entries on content, creativity, impact and excellence in communicating religious values.
Hiel's reports competed with entries from newspapers outside the top 15 markets in the country. The national market award for newspaper coverage went to the Christian Science Monitor Weekly. CBS television won four Wilbur Awards for reports aired on “60 Minutes” and other programs. Other winners included The History Channel, The Huffington Post and author Mitch Albom.
The awards are to be presented on April 5 in Nashville. They are named for the late Marvin C. Wilbur, longtime council leader and former Presbyterian Church executive.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.