State Superior Court denies ex-Sen. Jane Orie's corruption appeal
The Pennsylvania Superior Court upheld former state Sen. Jane Orie's conviction and sentence on corruption charges Thursday, a month after her release from prison.
Superior Court Judge Paula Ott upheld the former Senate Republican whip's June 2012 conviction for using state-paid staff for campaign work and forging documents, among other charges, and her prison sentence.
In her appeal, Orie claimed there was not enough evidence to support her conviction.
The District Attorney's Office declined comment. Orie's attorney, William Costopolous, did not return calls.
The decision means Orie, 52, of McCandless will not get her pension back, and cannot run for office again. She can appeal to the court to hear her arguments again, or to the state Supreme Court.
Adam Brandolph is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-391-0927 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Contempt citation sought by state against Highmark for alleged violation of deal with UPMC
- VA promotion for administrator stuns legislator
- Canadians more fearful, aware after ‘very rare’ attack in Ottawa
- Peduto, Harris compromise on $1.6M for North Side community center
- Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office asked to prosecute case alleging assault of Allegheny County assistant district attorney
- Prosecutors say cyanide-death defendant Ferrante tested toxin on mice to gauge effect on human
- Newsmaker: Mary Barkhymer
- Proposal to limit access divides Penn Hills, Homewood neighborhoods
- Pittsburgh police officers start wearing video cameras
- Savvy Service Employees International Union ‘keeps light on’
- Western Pennsylvania residents chill about forecasters’ spat