Monroeville weighs action on allegedly flawed probe into 911 computer system
Monroeville Council will decide next week whether an investigator will be hired to examine a probe into allegations that unauthorized individuals accessed information through the community's 911 dispatch computer system.
A move to potentially launch a new investigation was criticized this week by residents and legal experts, who accused council of violating state law.
Solicitor Bruce Dice said the cost of any new investigation, if approved by council, would not exceed $10,000.
“There's no deal yet,” Dice said at a council meeting on Thursday. “There's no contract for an internal probe.”
Dice said he had inquired with CSI Western PA in recent weeks to gauge its interest in conducting an investigation, but the firm had only “made some inquiries.” Council has not publicly discussed the decision to reach out to CSI Western PA.
A decision made without discussion in a public meeting could violate the Pennsylvania Sunshine Act, said Melissa Melewsky, media law counsel for the Pennsylvania NewsMedia Association in Harrisburg.
Councilman Ron Harvey said council was supposed to vote on hiring the investigator at meetings last month, but didn't. He called it an oversight.
The law firm Dickie McCamey & Chilcote P.C. was hired to conduct the previous investigation that led to then-Manager Lynette McKinney firing a police chief and three dispatchers. The four employees have since been returned to their positions, and McKinney, who was later fired, has filed a lawsuit seeking severance pay from the municipality.
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.