Newsmakers: Nicholas and Louis Suarez
The Carnegie Library Board of Trustees named Nicholas, 18, (left) and Louis Suarez, 16, both of Dormont, as winners of the 2013 Community Advocate of the Year award.
Noteworthy: The Carnegie Library Board of Pittsburgh named the brothers the 2013 Community Advocate of the Year. They are the youngest winners of the award, established in 2011, to recognize outstanding library advocacy by community members.
Age : Nicholas, 18, and Louis, 16
Family: Parents Angela and Steven Suarez
Education: Nicholas is a freshman at the University of Pittsburgh. Louis is a home-schooled 10th grader.
Background: As of March 27, the brothers have volunteered a combined total of 807 hours at Beechview Library, which had once been targeted to close. Their volunteer work includes preparing for Summer Reading Club events, grilling hotdogs at the annual Summer Reading Kick-Off cook-outs, assisting in the flower sale and cleaning children's books. Louis has presented two well-attended classical guitar programs for the public and organized a beginning chess class for children.
Quote: “I spend a lot of time at the library. It's really nice to give back to something I've gotten so much out of,” Nick said.
“The library is an important part of my community. I want to help the library so it can keep going,” Louis said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.