Share This Page

Newsmaker: Helen Cahalane

| Wednesday, May 14, 2014, 11:39 p.m.
Helen Cahalane, 57, of Edgewood, was named Social Worker of the Year by the local chapter of the National Association of Social Workers.

Noteworthy: The local chapter of the National Association of Social Workers named Cahalane as Social Worker of the Year at a ceremony at the University of Pittsburgh. She has helped improve conditions for thousands of children and families in the mental health and child welfare system. She established a major youth leadership program for teens, advocated for new child-welfare reporting legislation and oversaw the Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center in Mechanicsburg.

Age: 57

Residence: Edgewood

Family: Husband, Jack Cahalane

Occupation: Clinical associate professor in the School of Social Work at Pitt

Background: Principal investigator of child welfare education and research programs, she has worked full time at Pitt since 1997. Previously, she was director of the Social Work Department at Western Psychiatric Institute & Clinic.

Education: Bachelor's degree in social work from Shepherd College in Shepherdstown, W.Va., and a master's degree and doctorate, both in social work, from Pitt

Quote: “I am tremendously proud to be a social worker, and I always knew I wanted to be a social worker.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.