Gateway School Board approves teacher contract offer
The Gateway School Board approved a teachers contract offer Wednesday after more than eight months of negotiations.
The school board voted 8-1 in favor of the three-year contract offer, which school director Chad Stubenbort said would increase teacher salaries by an average of $2,311 per year and make teachers responsible for 10 percent of their annual health care costs. The previous contract, which expired in August, capped health care expenses at $65 per month.
Stubenbort was the only district official who would discuss the contract, which administrators said would not be made public until teachers ratify it. Teachers are expected to vote on the offer at a meeting on Thursday. Teachers' union president Mike Krestar declined to comment until the vote.
Stubenbort said he voted against the contract in part because salary increases would cost the district $2.8 million by 2017. Teachers worked this school year without a contract while negotiations continued. Once approved, the contract would be retroactive to last fall.
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached
at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Plum officials reassess equipment policy after sexual assault case
- Pittsburgh police solve fewer homicides
- Allegheny County to increase restaurant penalties
- Plum teacher’s lawyer says latest allegations don’t measure up
- Duquesne man arrested again for Megan’s Law violations
- Security cameras, more police planned at Monroeville Mall
- Detour signs highlight woes expected in Bigelow and Baum projects in Pittsburgh
- Pittsburgh police find missing 75-year-old man
- Newsmaker: Sara Mantick
- Pittsburgh man going to prison for fatally stabbing girlfriend’s son with butcher knife
- Teen missing for a week found safe by Pittsburgh missing persons unit