West Allegheny School District scraps landfill tax over legal questions
West Allegheny School District no longer intends to adopt a $3-a-ton tax on the use of landfills because of concerns about whether it would be legal.
The school district ran a legal ad in the Tribune-Review in June announcing its intent to authorize a tax “on the transaction of depositing waste at and usage of landfills” within the district.
Edward Faux, vice president of the school board, said district solicitor Bill Andrews explained the board did not have the legal authority to tax landfills.
West Allegheny originally decided to tax landfill usage when it learned Elizabeth Forward School District had a similar tax, he said.
“We thought we should pass a similar resolution if (Elizabeth Forward) thought they knew something we didn't,” Faux said.
The Elizabeth Forward school board voted 5-3 to adopt the resolution on April 23. In May, the board chose to balance the district's 2014-15 budget without it.
Since then, some have voiced concerns about the legality of the resolution.
Waste Management has asked the board to repeal its resolution, which would require the Kelly Run Landfill to pay an increased tax to the board, said spokeswoman Erika Deyarmin.
“We are trying to come to an agreement about it,” she said. Deyarmin declined to comment further about Waste Management's discussion with the school board.
Patricia McGrail, solicitor for the district, said officials hope to discuss the resolution with the Kelly Run Landfill to determine the amount of business it transacts.
Pennsylvania's Act 101 of 1988 regulates solid waste management and recycling statewide, said Mark Pedersen, president of the Pennsylvania Waste Industries Association, an organization representing landfill operators.
The act preempts the Pennsylvania Local Tax Enabling Act, which Pedersen said Elizabeth Forward reportedly used as authority for the tax increase.
“Thus, the action taken by them was not a legal action, and I believe they are looking into this situation,” he said.
A similar sentiment is echoed in a state Department of Community and Economic Development taxation manual.
“(Act 101) preempts and supersedes any tax on landfills or resource recovery facilities above the rate in effect on Dec. 31, 1987,” the manual says. “No new landfill privilege taxes may be enacted.”
Some members of the association are in contact with the district about the tax. Pedersen declined to provide their names.
Megan Henney is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7987 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Lawsuit: Pittsburgh Public Schools should have known officer was abusing boys
- Highmark asks patients to ‘Meet Dr. Right’
- 2 from Carrick charged in connection with rash of heroin overdoses
- Development could soon be booming in West End
- Police confiscated cellphone of driver who struck 7-year-old girl Thursday
- Justice halts religious groups’ birth control opt-out role
- Teachers union advises lawyers for colleagues of Plum pair investigated on sex charges
- Pitt, Penn State faculty found to receive better-than-average pay
- Voters wishing to cast ballot in May 19 primary must register by Monday
- Allegheny County sheriff’s deputy mending from Family Court scuffle
- Heinz Endowments looks to smart urban planning for Pittsburgh moment