Lightning blamed for Dormont fire
Fire officials said lightning from severe thunderstorms might have sparked a fire that damaged a popular Dormont grocery.
Dormont Deputy Fire Chief Jim Kolesky said seven fire companies responded to a three-alarm fire that started about 10:20 p.m. Wednesday at People's Food Mart on Potomac Avenue.
Kolesky called the damage to the market, which was closed Thursday, “substantial but repairable.” A fire marshal hasn't confirmed a cause, he said.
“It happened right during the peak of that storm,” Kolesky said. The store was closed, and no one was inside when the fire started.
Next door, Sara Bigos was closing Knossos Gyros after 10 p.m. when she heard a bang and felt the building shake. “It scared me, how loud it was,” Bigos, 26, of Beechview said.
Several minutes later, she said, a few kids banged on the restaurant's windows, shouting that the building was on fire. Bigos said she went outside, saw flames on the market's roof and called 911.
People's Food Mart opened in 2011 in Dormont's business district. Owners couldn't be reached for comment.
“It's a community-run store. I'm sure there are a lot of people that rely on them to get their groceries,” said Jaime Wilson-Spik, 35, of Dormont. She believed she heard a lightning strike from her home a street away and worried that it hit her business, Alter Ego Body Art Studio, two doors from People's Food Mart.
Dormont resident Dana DeSimone, 53, said the store owner tries to provide the community with something it didn't have before. She has to take a trolley in order to get to another grocery store, she said.
People's front window was covered with boards on Thursday, and damage was evident from the street. Passers-by on Potomac Avenue stopped and talked about the fire.
Kelsey Shea is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or at 724-772-6353.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.