ShareThis Page

Hydro Green Energy wants to build hydroelectric plant on Monongahela River

| Saturday, July 19, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

A Dallas startup could become the first company to operate a hydroelectric power plant in Allegheny County.

Hydro Green Energy wants to build a 5.2-megawatt, low-impact hydroelectric plant at the Braddock Locks and Dam on the Monongahela River.

Adding power to existing dams is quicker, cheaper and less risky than building dams, said the Department of Energy, which is promoting the development of low-impact hydropower at dams.

That's the approach Hydro Green Energy and other companies plan to take.

If the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approves Hydro Green's planned $15 million Braddock project, it would produce enough power for about 5,250 homes and be the company's first commercial use of its technology, said Mike Maley, president and CEO.

“We're barely going to be visible, and we're going to have virtually no environmental impact. That's why we're very comfortable with our technology,” he said.

A Boston company, Free Flow Power, is seeking approval to build 10 low-impact hydroelectric power stations — including at Allegheny Lock and Dam No. 2 and at Emsworth Locks and Dam — on the Allegheny, Ohio and Monongahela rivers.

Hydro Green is awaiting final licenses for other projects, similar to its Braddock proposal, on the Allegheny River near Oakmont and on the Monongahela River near Morgantown, W.Va. The Braddock project is further along in the approval process, Maley said.

Hydro Green has 15 projects planned across the country.

Hydropower is the nation's largest renewable energy source for electricity generation, but it accounted for only about 6 percent of total generation in 2013, according to the federal Energy Information Administration.

About 2,500 dams provide 78 gigawatts of conventional hydropower in the United States, but there are more than 80,000 dams that do not produce electricity, according to a 2012 report from the Department of Energy.

The Army Corps of Engineers owns the Braddock Locks and Dam. Hydro Green started its application process in 2011, and hopes to obtain its license in time to start construction in the first quarter of 2015, Maley said.

“They put you through your paces,” he said. “They make sure that everything meets every standard possible.”

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff issued an environmental assessment for the project on June 13 but hasn't set a timeframe for issuing the license, spokesman Craig Cano said.

Building hydropower plants in Pennsylvania is a smart approach, said Jay Apt, director of the Carnegie Mellon Electricity Industry Center.

“This is a more company-friendly environment, because the wholesale prices for electricity are higher in our region than they are in most of the areas where the Mississippi River flows,” Apt said.

The Pennsylvania Environmental Council supports hydropower projects that use existing infrastructure, such as the Army Corps' locks and dams, and projects that will not be used temporarily, said Lindsay Baxter, a program manager in the council's Southwestern District office in the Strip District.

“We have the topography and the water resources in Pennsylvania to support a lot of low-impact hydro,” Baxter said.

Tory N. Parrish is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-5662 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.