Apartments eyed for former Health Department offices in Oakland
A developer plans to replace the former Allegheny County Health Department office in Oakland with apartments.
It's one of two housing developments proposed in Pittsburgh that need special-exception zoning approvals from the city Zoning Board of Adjustment. The board will meet on July 31.
Ambling University Development Group of Valdosta, Ga., wants to build 389 apartments at the 3333 Forbes Ave. site. In the other project, Jack Benoff of Solara Ventures in Philadelphia plans to convert a building at 2419 Smallman St. in the Strip District into 38 to 40 condominiums.
Ambling would build, own and manage the Oakland apartments, according to Gary Wilson, a member of MWK Forbes LLC, which acquired the property from the county for $4.9 million. There would be ground-floor commercial and retail space, according to an application filed with the zoning board.
MWK plans to demolish two houses on Forbes to build a 125- to 150-room boutique hotel and parking garage. The garage would include spaces to accommodate tenants of the apartments.
Among 63 projects Ambling has undertaken are campus residence halls — a $180 million development under way at Millersville University in Lancaster County, and a $20 million project at West Virginia State University in Institute.
Solara's condo proposal follows its successful sell-out of the 58-unit Otto Milk Building Condominium in the Strip District. Solara also converted a building at 941 Penn Ave., Downtown, into residences.
Sam Spatter is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7843 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.