ShareThis Page

Kaufman Foundation awards research grants to schools, including Pitt, CMU

| Thursday, July 24, 2014, 10:30 p.m.

The Charles E. Kaufman Foundation announced on Thursday the recipients of its 2014 research grants.

The foundation said it received more than 240 applications from more than 30 universities across the state, compared with 170 applications in 2013.

Awards went to researchers from six schools, including the University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University.

Tzahi Cohen-Karni, assistant professor of biomedical engineering at CMU; Nathan Clark, assistant professor of computational and systems biology at Pitt; and David Pekker, assistant professor of physics and astronomy at Pitt, each will receive grants of $150,000 over the next two years.

These research teams will receive grants of $300,000 over two years:

• Alison Barth, associate professor of biological sciences, and Marcel Bruchez, associate professor of biological sciences and chemistry, both of CMU

• Alexander Deiters, professor of chemistry, and Michael Tsang, associate professor of developmental biology, both of Pitt

• Anna Balazs, distinguished professor of chemical and petroleum engineering at Pitt, working with Ayusman Sen, distinguished professor of chemistry at Penn State

The Pittsburgh-based foundation provides funding for research in chemistry, biology and physics at research universities in Pennsylvania.

Charles Kaufman was a chemical engineer who invested well and amassed most of his wealth after retirement. He died in 2010 at 97.

Corinne Kennedy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7823 or ckennedy@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.