Share This Page

Authorities identify man killed in second Northview Heights shooting

| Friday, Aug. 1, 2014, 8:39 a.m.
Pittsburgh Bureau of Police
Maurice Freeman, 21, of Northview Heights died at Allegheny General Hospital at 2:17 a.m., Friday, Aug. 1, 2014, the Allegheny County Medical Examiner’s Office said. He was shot about an hour earlier.

A man was shot to death early Friday in what Pittsburgh police said was the second fatal shooting in three days at the Northview Heights public housing complex on the North Side.

Maurice Freeman, 21, of Northview Heights, died at Allegheny General Hospital at 2:17 a.m., the Allegheny County Medical Examiner's Office said. He was shot about an hour earlier.

Two men were shot, one fatally, in the same complex on Wednesday.

Eugene T. David, 19, of Forest Hills died and the other victim, who police said was 41, suffered a gunshot wound to his leg. He was taken to Allegheny General Hospital, where he was in good condition.

Friday morning's shooting occurred near the 100 block of Hazlett Street. Freeman was found in a courtyard with at least one gunshot wound to the chest. He was unconscious when paramedics arrived, police said.

Police said the motive for the shooting is unclear and there are no suspects. Police urged anyone with information to call the homicide squad at 412-323-7161. Callers may remain anonymous.

Bobby Kerlik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7886 or bkerlik@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.