Peters Township School District settles age, gender discrimination complaint
Seventeen female teachers and guidance counselors settled their gender and age discrimination lawsuit against Peters Township School District, the lawyer for the teachers said Friday.
Lawyer Colleen Johnston said she couldn't disclose the details of the agreement.
“The 17 female teachers who brought this action are very pleased that the school district remedied an unequal pay situation,” she said
Attorneys for both sides filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit on Friday. The motion doesn't provide details of the settlement.
A district spokeswoman referred questions to the district's solicitor, who couldn't be reached for comment.
The teachers claimed the district didn't properly recognize their work experience when it determined their pay and hired “significantly younger and/or male teachers” at higher salaries and awarded them credit for teaching experience.
The district said in court documents that the school board relied on the different superintendents who hired the women between 1993 and 2008 and that, in general, the superintendents tried to get the most qualified applicant at the lowest pay the person would accept.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Western Pennsylvania residents chill about forecasters’ spat
- Pittsburgh wins Gawker.com ugliest accent tourney n’at
- Legal titans prepared to tussle in Ferrante cyanide homicide trial
- Prosecutor in Ferrante cyanide trial attacked; partner charged with assault
- Rules hamper Franklin Regional attack victim scholarships
- Water process eyed for 2 parks in Allegheny County
- Judge expected to sign sale order for August Wilson Center for African American Culture
- Newsmaker: Chuck Bogosta
- Pittsburgh photo exhibit shines light on ‘Good’ work
- Pittsburgh VA director gets more time to appeal firing recommendation
- Pittsburgh Trails Advocacy Group volunteers cut trail in South Park