Penn Hills schools' transit director resigns
The Penn Hills School District's transportation director resigned slightly more than a year since he took the job, and just a day into the school year.
The school board unanimously accepted Allen Ayers' letter of resignation, effective Sept. 5, at its first meeting of the 2014-15 school year on Monday.
Ayers could not be reached for comment.
Solicitor Craig Alexander added the resignation to the agenda after the meeting began.
Ayers started in August 2013 at a salary of $50,000 a year. His resignation coincided with the first day of school, marked by a number of late or missed bus stop pickups. Superintendent Thomas Washington said some busses were “extremely late” in getting some students home.
Board member Pauline Calabrese said many districts have problems with transportation on the first day of school.
“Make no mistake about it, it's not the bus company's fault,” she said. She declined to elaborate.
School directors ended the district's contract with transportation provider First Student Inc. on June 30, opting to sign a five-year deal with AJ Myers & Sons Inc.
Board President Denise Graham-Shealey said issues with first-day transportation affected her children.
“I take it personal, and I am sorry,” she told the school-board audience.
About 4,000 students were enrolled in the district at the end of the 2013-14 school year.
“This is a little bit shocking on the first day of school,” Jane Marra, whose daughter is a freshman at Penn Hills High School, said about Ayers' resignation.
Patrick Varine is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7845 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.