Allegheny County Council's motto plan expands
One motto wasn't enough.
A proposal to post “In God We Trust” in Allegheny County Council's meeting room expanded on Thursday to include “e pluribus unum,” which means in Latin “out of many, one” and “virtue, liberty and independence,” Pennsylvania's motto.
“Instead of this becoming a religious thing, it becomes something to honor our mottoes' history,” said Councilman Ed Kress, R-Shaler, whose amendment tripled the mottoes.
Members of council's Government Reform Committee voted to send the amended bill to the full council for a vote. Councilwoman Barbara Daly Danko, D-Regent Square, cast the lone vote against the proposal. Council members have not discussed how much posting the mottoes would cost.
“Why are we even doing this?” Danko asked. “I don't know if any of us were elected to put a plaque up in the Gold Room.”
Council holds its twice-monthly meetings in the Gold Room of the Allegheny County Courthouse, Downtown.
Councilwoman Sue Means, R-Bethel Park, introduced a proposal in July to post “In God We Trust” and the Bill of Rights on a plaque in the Gold Room. Her proposal is part of a national movement to put the phrase in municipal and county government meeting rooms. About 380 counties and municipalities in the United States have approved displaying the motto, Means said.
The state House approved a bill in June allowing schools to post “In God We Trust” and the Bill of Rights, a step back from an earlier bill that mandated it. Butler County and Butler city officials approved placing the phrase in their meeting rooms in April.
Means, who supported the amendment adding other mottoes, said council should post “In God We Trust” for patriotic and historic reasons. She did not mention religion.
State Rep. Rick Saccone, R-Elizabeth Township, has urged posting “In God We Trust” in Western Pennsylvania municipal buildings. He addressed council members in July.
“This is not a religious issue, this is a history issue,” Saccone told council members.
Audrey Glickman, 57, of Greenfield said that is “baloney.” The debate over “In God We Trust” is a religious issue, Glickman said. She addressed council twice about her opposition to displaying “In God We Trust” and attended Thursday's meeting. She doesn't support the amended proposal.
“It's other citizens trying to impose their religion,” Glickman said. “Religion should be out of the civil sphere. When we go to do the people's business, if we are open and honest about it, then we are serving whatever we believe in.”
Council will likely vote on posting the mottoes and the Bill of Rights at its Sept. 9 meeting.
Aaron Aupperlee is a Trib Total Media staff writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Allegheny police seek non-custodial dad, missing 4-year-old son
- Number of jobs in high-tech industry outpace workers in Pittsburgh, nation
- Mandated sewer project to increase Alcosan customers’ bills
- Nonprofits replace humdrum charity 5Ks with rappelling
- Identical twins born at West Penn Hospital a rare medical marvel
- Internet access still out of reach for some, Census figures show
- Fees, interest mount over August Wilson site, Dollar claims
- Manufacturing, social aid pitch earns $25K prize in East Liberty contest
- Pittsburgh Public evacuates 3 schools after voicemail threat
- City of Pittsburgh detective, 2 boys finalize adoption before judge
- Embattled VFW mulls image among declining numbers