ShareThis Page

Giant Eagle says Whole Foods suit 'without merit'

| Tuesday, Sept. 9, 2014, 11:06 p.m.

The developers of a planned Whole Foods Market in Upper St. Clair added Giant Eagle to a lawsuit claiming the rival grocer fought their efforts to build on the former Consol Energy headquarters site.

Jerry Cipriani and Hal Kestler, doing business as Washington Road Associates, filed their complaint in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court late last week naming Giant Eagle as a co-defendant in the case. They say the O'Hara-based company made numerous attempts to derail or delay inclusion of Whole Foods in a mixed-use development at Washington and Fort Couch roads. The suit also names attorney Tom Ayoob and Greenfield, Mass.-based Sprawl Busters as co-defendants.

“Contrary to the allegations in the complaint, Giant Eagle consistently has acted ethically in voicing its concerns about the development and the potential impact on the surrounding community,” a statement from Giant Eagle spokesman Rob Borella said. “The complaint contains numerous material misstatements and is wholly without merit.”

The lawsuit said the defendants “conspired to unlawfully stifle competition to Giant Eagle's Bethel Park Market District store.”

The developers are seeking unspecified damages for lost business and mounting costs related to delays in the project.

The complaint says Giant Eagle, which has a Market District store less than a mile from the development site, first attempted to discourage Consol from selling its former headquarters to Washington Road Associates. When that didn't work, Giant Eagle executives met with WRA and offered to buy a large stake in the development, in exchange for cutting out Whole Foods.

The suit claims that Giant Eagle funded Sprawl Busters, a group that helps communities organize resistance to big-box developments. It also accuses Giant Eagle of recruiting and financing “straw plaintiffs” to challenge and appeal the project's approval at various stages.

Giant Eagle officials have said they provided legal, technical and financial support to residents opposed to the project, but cited shared concerns over traffic the project could generate — not the inclusion of a competing grocery chain — in doing so.

Ayoob, who represented resident Moira Cain-Mannix in her appeals of the project, said his role “has been based upon the facts in the cases” and law he believed to be applicable; he noted other issues with the site's zoning remain under appeal. Representatives for Sprawl Busters could not be reached. WRA is suing Cain-Mannix in a separate case.

Matthew Santoni is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5625 or msantoni

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.