ShareThis Page

Mandated sewer project to increase Alcosan customers' bills

| Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2014, 9:59 p.m.
Jasmine Goldband | Trib Total Media
The odor-control ducts and scrubbers at the Alcosan wastewater treatment plant in the North Side
Jasmine Goldband | Trib Total Media
A birds-eye view of the Alcosan wastewater treatment plant in the North Side on Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2014.
Jasmine Goldband | Trib Total Media
Doug Jackson, director of operations and maintenance at Alcosan wastewater treatment plant, leads a tour of the North Side facility on Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2014.
Jasmine Goldband | Trib Total Media
The first bar screening catches items such as wash cloths on Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2014, in the Alcosan wastewater treatment plant in the North Side.
Jasmine Goldband | Trib Total Media
Examples of wastewater and byproducts are shown in various stages of treatment on Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2014, at the Alcosan wastewater treatment plant in the North Side.

A $2 billion plan to reduce the sewage that flows into rivers and streams likely will increase sewer bills beyond a key Environmental Protection Agency threshold that accounts for customer income, according to projections the Allegheny County Sanitary Authority released on Wednesday.

More than half of county households could spend more than 2 percent of their annual income on water bills by the time Alcosan completes the project in 2026.

About 14 percent of households, including those in Hazelwood, the Hill District, North Side, the Mon Valley and Penn Hills, could spend more than 3.5 percent.

Water bills account for about 1 percent of a household's income, according to Alcosan.

“My guess is we will see a lot of folks needing help,” said Julie DeSeyn, community impact director at United Way of Allegheny County. The United Way, Urban League of Greater Pittsburgh, North Hills Community Outreach and several other organizations assist people struggling with utility bills. People can call 211 for help.

Alcosan raised rates by 17 percent this year and will increase rates by 11 percent each of the next three years to help pay for the federally-mandated project.

The median income in Allegheny County is $50,884, according to 2012 Census Bureau data, the most recent available. Jonathan Weaver, a housing counselor with the Mon Valley Initiative, said an average homeowner could spend $100 to $150 a month on water.

The EPA forced Alcosan to limit the 9 billion gallons of untreated wastewater that flow into rivers during heavy storms by 2026. Alcosan expects to spend $1.5 billion to build storage tunnels and double the capacity of its North Side treatment plant. Municipalities could spend $500 million on improvements.

In January, the EPA and Justice Department told Alcosan its plan did not meet requirements, according to a letter that has not been made public. Alcosan and federal agencies continue to work on the plan. Executive Director Arletta Scott Williams said she hoped to have an agreement in place by the end of the year.

The EPA rejected Alcosan's first proposal, a $3.6 billion plan, because it did not meet the agency's affordability standards, said David W. Borneman, director of engineering and construction at Alcosan. Borneman said the region can afford the scaled-back $2 billion plan.

Similar wet-weather projects across the country raised water bills to 2 percent of household income or higher, Alcosan spokeswoman Jeanne Clark said. The EPA considers costs exceeding 2 percent a high burden.

Alcosan charges $5.05 per 1,000 gallons of water. The charge is included in municipal water bills. Families typically can't reduce water usage, said Scott Rubin, a public utilities consultant and attorney in Columbia County.

“It's a real concern ... when those necessary utility bills start taking more of a household's income,” Rubin said.

Aaron Aupperlee is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7986 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.