VA promotion for administrator stuns legislator
The Department of Veterans Affairs is promoting an administrator who advised against publicly disclosing a deadly Legionnaires' outbreak at its Pittsburgh hospital system, the agency told Congress.
David Cord, deputy director of VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System since June 2012, will become director of the Erie VA Medical Center within 60 days, the VA informed Congress.
The VA disclosed the Legionnaires' outbreak that killed at least six and sickened at least 16 others on Nov. 16, 2012 — two days after Cord told a VA spokesman not to alert the public about it, according to an internal email from the spokesman obtained as part of a Tribune-Review investigation.
The VA did not respond to requests to interview Cord, disclose his new salary, or say why the agency chose him to replace Dr. Michael Adelman in Erie.
Cord, a 13-year veteran of the agency, did not return calls to his office and home.
Cord's salary in 2013 was $127,531, according to a database of federal salaries.
Gary Devansky, director of the Pittsburgh-based Veterans Integrated Service Network 4, said in an email to Congress he was “excited to bring Mr. Cord on board” as director in Erie. VISN4 region includes most of Pennsylvania, all of Delaware, and parts of New Jersey, New York, Ohio and West Virginia.
“His unique leadership experience and insight as an Air Force veteran will be valuable assets for the facility, the employees and volunteers, and most importantly for the veterans we are honored to serve,” Devansky wrote.
U.S. Rep. Tim Murphy, R-Upper St. Clair, called the promotion “incomprehensible and indefensible.” Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Butler, who represents Erie, declined comment until he talks to Cord, a spokesman said.
Murphy and Cord tangled during a contentious series of phone calls on May 29 in which Cord said veterans in Pittsburgh didn't wait longer than 30 days for care, and that the facility didn't keep a secret waiting list like one in Phoenix that caused a national outcry, an aide to Murphy said.
That same day, VA Pittsburgh Director Terry Gerigk Wolf told Rep. Mike Doyle, D-Forest Hills, that a separate list included more than 700 veterans trying to enroll for care. Some waited longer than a year for their first appointment.
Two weeks later, acting VA Secretary Sloan Gibson suspended Wolf with pay for her role in the Legionnaires' outbreak, which the VA and the Centers for Disease Control said occurred between February 2011 and November 2012.
On Nov. 14, 2012, two days before the VA Pittsburgh disclosed the outbreak, former spokesman David Cowgill wrote to an aide of VA Pittsburgh Chief of Staff Dr. Ali Sonel that Cord “does not want to be proactive and go to the media with a statement.”
Instead, Cord wanted Cowgill to prepare a statement, in case “they come to us, which we are anticipating they will,” said the email that the Trib obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request.
Six months later, when the VA Office of Inspector General issued a report documenting failures that led to the outbreak, Cord emailed Cowgill expressing worry about demands from Congress and veterans' families that VA Pittsburgh officials face discipline.
“Great. Its(sic) clear the lawmakers want a head on a platter at this point,” Cord wrote to Cowgill on April 24, 2013.
As director of the VA Erie Medical Center, Cord will oversee 650 employees and facilities in six counties, serving 23,000 veterans, according to the VA. The center has a budget of nearly $116 million.
In an emailed response to Trib questions about Cord's promotion, VA Pittsburgh spokesman Mark Ray responded: “VA extends its condolences to the families of the veterans affected by acquiring Legionella in our healthcare system,” and has taken steps to beef up its Legionella prevention.
Mike Wereschagin is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7900 or email@example.com.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.