ShareThis Page

Newsmaker: Michael E. Bleier

| Tuesday, Dec. 2, 2014, 12:01 a.m.
Michael E. Bleier, 72, of Mt. Lebanon.
Submitted
Michael E. Bleier, 72, of Mt. Lebanon.

Noteworthy: Bleier received the American Bar Association's Frank Simpson III Award, which recognizes outstanding service to its Banking Law Committee. He is the 17th recipient of the award, which was first presented in 1994 but is not made annually.

Age: 72

Residence: Mt. Lebanon

Family: Wife, Carol, three children and eight grandchildren.

Occupation: Bleier is a partner in the financial industry group at law firm Reed Smith, which has more than 1,800 lawyers in 25 offices in Pittsburgh and locations worldwide. Bleier joined Reed Smith in 2007, after serving as Mellon Financial Corp.'s general counsel. Before Mellon, he worked at the Federal Reserve in Washington for 11 years.

Education: Bachelor's degree, University of Tulsa, 1962, economics and history; law degree, Georgetown University Law Center, 1965.

Background: The Banking Law Committee said Simpson established a collegial atmosphere that made it possible for members to speak freely at meetings about complex banking law, without fear of criticism. Simpson knew much about banking law but welcomed comments without becoming judgmental.

Quote: “To be recognized with the Frank Simpson Award by one's peers and betters is truly humbling and meaningful. ... Those standards are quite high, but I intend to continue to act in a manner that affirms the committee's decision.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.