ShareThis Page

Newsmaker: Dr. Miya Asato

| Monday, April 6, 2015, 10:50 p.m.
Dr. Miya Asato as provided by Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC. Asato recently won the Dr. Philip Troen Excellence in Medical Student Research Mentoring Award at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
Dr. Miya Asato as provided by Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC. Asato recently won the Dr. Philip Troen Excellence in Medical Student Research Mentoring Award at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.

Noteworthy: Asato recently won the Dr. Philip Troen Excellence in Medical Student Research Mentoring Award at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. Asato emerged from a field of 150 faculty mentors to win. She has mentored about 10 students over the past six years.

Age: 49

Residence: Point Breeze

Family: Husband, George Childs; two children, Laura and Sam

Occupation: Asato is an associate professor of pediatrics and an attending physician in child neurology at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC in Lawrenceville. She is program director of the Neurodevelopmental Disabilities Residency and co-director of the Child Neurology Residency at the hospital.

Education: Bachelor's degree in occupational therapy from Tufts University in Boston in 1987; medical degree in 1995 at the former Jefferson Medical College in Philadelphia

Background: Having grown up in the Princeton area of New Jersey, Asato worked as an occupational therapist before delving into medicine. She has worked at Children's Hospital for about 20 years.

Quote: “The next best thing to taking care of my patients and families is to mentor the next generation of physicians. Child neurology is a very small specialty despite patient and family needs in the community, so mentoring physicians to become leaders in this field is one of my personal missions.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.