ShareThis Page

Newsmaker: Dr. Bernard Kühn

Ben Schmitt
| Saturday, Aug. 22, 2015, 6:24 p.m.
Dr. Bernard Kühn, a scientist at the Richard King Mellon Foundation Institute for Pediatric Research at Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, received a $200,000 grant from the Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Foundation for cardiovascular regeneration research.
Dr. Bernard Kühn, a scientist at the Richard King Mellon Foundation Institute for Pediatric Research at Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, received a $200,000 grant from the Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Foundation for cardiovascular regeneration research.

Noteworthy: Kühn, a scientist at the Richard King Mellon Foundation Institute for Pediatric Research at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, received a $200,000 grant from the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Foundation for cardiovascular regeneration research.

Age: 45

Residence: Squirrel Hill

Family: Wife, Carolina; daughter, Beatrice, 9; sons, Markus, 7 and Mattias, 5

Background: Kühn, a native of Germany, is an associate professor of pediatrics at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. He is also the director of research at Children's Heart Institute, and has been focused on the unique workings of heart muscle cells. His long-term objective is to provide novel approaches for the treatment of heart failure.

Education: Kühn received a Doctor of Medicine (Ph.D. equivalent) and medical degree from Freie University in Berlin, Germany.

Quote: “This funding will allow my team to enter the field of fibrosis research, a new area of investigation for my lab. If successful, this project will provide a broadly applicable molecular-genetic blueprint for the field of cardiovascular development and for developing new drugs to reduce fibrosis in heart disease. This is just a dream come true.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.