ShareThis Page
News

Newsmaker: Jay Carson

| Thursday, Aug. 27, 2015, 10:57 p.m.
Jay Carson, senior vice president for institutional advancement at Robert Morris University in Moon, was named 2015 Outstanding Fundraising Executive by the Western Pennsylvania chapter of the Association of Fundraising Professionals.
Jay Carson, senior vice president for institutional advancement at Robert Morris University in Moon, was named 2015 Outstanding Fundraising Executive by the Western Pennsylvania chapter of the Association of Fundraising Professionals.

Noteworthy: Carson, senior vice president for institutional advancement at Robert Morris University in Moon, was named 2015 Outstanding Fundraising Executive by the Western Pennsylvania chapter of the Association of Fundraising Professionals. He will be recognized Nov. 12, National Philanthropy Day, at the Heinz History Center.

Age: 59

Residence: Highland Park

Family: Wife, Anita; three sons, twins Mackenzie and Jacob, 26, and Ryan, 23

Education: Bachelor's degree in English, University of Pittsburgh, 1978; master's degree in education, Pitt, 1981

Background: RMU recently raised more than $41 million, exceeding its capital campaign goal by $1 million. The university used the money to build academic buildings for its schools of business, communications and nursing. Before joining RMU in 2006, Carson held similar positions at Saint Vincent College in Latrobe, the Pittsburgh Foundation and the Pittsburgh Cultural Trust.

Quote: “It's wonderful to be honored by my colleagues and peers. It was very kind and gracious of them, so it's a humbling experience. There are a lot of fingerprints on this success. This is not done by Jay Carson. It's done by lots and lots of people.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me