ShareThis Page

Newsmaker: Elaine Luther

| Monday, Oct. 12, 2015, 11:12 p.m.
Dr. Elaine Luther is professor of Business Management at Point Park University’s School of Business.
Submitted
Dr. Elaine Luther is professor of Business Management at Point Park University’s School of Business.

Noteworthy: Received the 2015 International Association of Business Communicators, Pittsburgh Chapter, Business Communicator of the Year Award.

Age: 63

Residence: Oakmont

Occupation: Professor of business management at Point Park University School of Business

Background: Worked at PepsiCo in McKees Rocks; then Allied Signal, now a part of Honeywell in New Jersey; then was director of finance at Schering-Plough, a pharmaceutical company. She ran a consulting business for eight years and taught part time before working for Point Park. Since joining Point Park, she obtained professional certification from the Society of Human Resource Managers and passed the IRS enrolled agent exam.

Education: Bachelor of science, University of Pittsburgh, 1973; Master of business administration, Pitt, 1976; Doctorate, Robert Morris University, 2005

Quote: “I have always tried to make business concepts accessible to all audiences. When helping colleagues and friends with accounting and tax questions, they often suggested that I should be teaching. My corporate managers always commented on my ability to quickly understand and explain complex business issues. ... The public wants to understand how complex finance, marketing and other business issues impact them without excessive jargon.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.