ShareThis Page

Locals fear impact of transit plans on Panther Hollow neighborhood

| Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2015, 10:54 p.m.
Heidi Murrin | Trib Total Media
A proposed transit project through Junction Hollow “will destroy this unique neighborhood, Carlino Giapolo, a lifelong resident of Panther Hollow, said Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2015. “It’s a jewel.”
Heidi Murrin | Trib Total Media
A proposed transit project through Junction Hollow “will destroy this unique neighborhood, Carlino Giapolo, a lifelong resident of Panther Hollow, said Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2015. “It’s a jewel.”

Pittsburgh's Urban Redevelopment Authority expects to learn next week whether it will receive up to $3 million in state funding to help build a road for shuttles through Oakland's Junction Hollow.

The shuttle-only road would be part of a larger, $7.2 million project to provide a faster, more direct link between Oakland's universities and two development sites along the Monongahela River — South Oakland's existing Pittsburgh Technology Center and a 178-acre site in Hazelwood where $1.1 billion in development is planned, including space for high-tech research and development.

“We clearly recognize the potential for this link to enhance economic development and job creation,” Carnegie Mellon University spokeswoman Abby Simmons said.

But Carlino Giampolo of Oakland's Panther Hollow section, just north of Junction Hollow Trail, is concerned added traffic and noise would “destroy what I think is one of Pittsburgh's most unique neighborhoods.”

The URA's application for state funding said the proposed shuttle route would “run south down Boundary Street (Panther Hollow's main thoroughfare) and then move onto the Junction Hollow Trail until ending where it meets Boundary Street again” in Greenfield. From there, the shuttles would follow Saline Street en route to the Almono site and Pittsburgh Technology Center, according to the application, which shows the route extending through Hazelwood.

Giampolo is concerned that the project would eat up homes and land, destroying the secluded neighborhood.

URA Chairman Kevin Acklin, who is Mayor Bill Peduto's chief of staff and chief development officer, said the “course of the connection has not been determined and will be subject to robust discussion with the public and stakeholders.”

At the same time, Acklin said “our strong preference is for the transit connection to parallel as much as possible the existing rail line” that runs through the area and avoid Junction Hollow Trail. He said the route ideally would veer off Boundary Street in the area of Joncaire, without entering the Panther Hollow neighborhood.

Acklin said the road would use public land along the railroad right-of-way. If the city used the eastern side of the tracks, it would need court approval because the land sits in Schenley Park, Acklin said.

“There will be no disruption of neighborhoods that happens as part of this connection,” Acklin said.

About two to 12 shuttles would run hourly, and they would carry an estimated 250 daily passengers, URA documents show.

Once an enclave for hundreds of Italian immigrants and their families, Panther Hollow sits in the shadow of the Cathedral of Learning at the bottom of steep Joncaire Street, largely tucked away from Oakland's hustle and bustle. Giampolo — who some residents call the “Mayor of Panther Hollow” — said college students now outnumber the fewer than two dozen longtime residents.

Aside from some students' occasional late-night activities and the trains and cars that rarely pass through, Giampolo said, “It's serene and peaceful down here. You can hear the birds chirping. ... We don't exist to benefit Carnegie Mellon and Pitt.”

South of Junction Hollow Trail, in Greenfield, Dave Proctor of Proctor's Garage said he welcomed the connection.

“It's progress. If it helps develop that (Almono) site, I say do it. It would be good for everybody,” Proctor said.

Tom Fontaine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.